Reply to RW vs LW news

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "RW vs LW news"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.[/quote]
WSJ is right wing. [/quote]

Only if you believe actual facts and news are right wing.

95% of the paper is a hardcore, objective newspaper, and the few opinion pages (yes, leaning right) are in one section you can simply jump over.

Compare that with the NYT or WaPo, where there's no way to separate facts and news from the (clearly left) opinions everywhere.[/quote]

No babe.
The WSJ opinion pages don’t “lean right”. They drifted off into crank territory after 2016. And it’s a real shame because it  besmirches the good name of a formerly great paper. [/quote]

Sweetie, if you're gonna lie do it in less an obvious manner. You can say many things about the WSJ, but "crank territory" is certainly not one. You must be projecting your own crank views. Stay sane.[/quote]
DP. “Stay sane”? I see why you don’t have a problem with WSJ’s nutso editorial staff.

“The Journal has a distinctly conservative, finance-focused sensibility; it also belongs squarely among the New York media elite. It is not where many reporters aspire to land, however, in large part because its reputation is so tainted by incendiary op-eds. For decades, the Journal newsroom has grumbled about leaps of logic and reckless ideology on the opinion side. During Trump’s presidency, the grumbling grew into a roar.” https://www.cjr.org/special_report/breaking_right_wall_street_journal_stubborn_murdoch.php

A few examples of absolutely [i]in[/i]sane WSJ editorials provided in that article include one that suggested that Dr Biden shouldn’t call herself a doctor because she’s not a doctor and a Mike Pence special that there’s no second covid wave. I mean…[/quote]

Good that you seem to trust CJR. Now explain and link to their 2023 series exposè of the NYT and WaPo fabrications and sustained biases since 2017. [/quote]

Whataboutism is lame. Stay on topic “sweetie” [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics