Reply to Lock him up indictment FL

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I really think many of you are [b]missing[/b] the obstruction. He had ample opportunity to work with NARA to return everything. He purposely mislead everyone. It never had to end this way had he returned everything.[/quote]

[img]https://media.tenor.com/y994phul8ZUAAAAM/office-space-missing.gif[/img]

Joking aside, they aren't [i]missing[/i] the obstruction. They are choosing to willfully ignore it. The truth is that the security powers that be are willing to work with you if you honestly screw up and come to them with a mea culpa. Not only was Trump taking the documents not a screw up, but intentional, he then chose to lie, have others lie on his behalf, and hide them.

People like to point at the Reality Winner case. She's not in jail because she accidentally took a document out of the building that got mixed in her personal stuff. She's in jail because she removed it intentionally.

[/quote]

Reality Winner had no ability to declassify documents. Trump did and no, he doesn’t have to ask permission of anyone to do so.[/quote]

But he didn’t declassify them.  And they have him on tape admitting he didn’t.[/quote]

LOL. No, they don’t. They claim they do. CNN has the exclusive dontchaknow[/quote]

The transcript is in the indictment.  Word for word.  Are you actually claiming smith made this up?[/quote]

Until they play the actual tape in court, yes. 52 intel analysts tell me not to take anything at face value[/quote]

Who do thin me you’re kidding?  When they play it in court you’ll dismiss it as faked.[/quote]

I guarantee they won’t play it because they would be required to show full context[/quote]

Sure, they quoted in the indictment but they won’t play it at trial.  Makes total sense. [/quote]

The recordings were handed over by Mark Meadow's staff. People around Trump gave sworn affidavits testifying to the contents of those recordings. They may not need to play the recording for it to be considered credible evidence. But it may be played to impeach Trump when he takes the stand and tries to lie or bs in federal court.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics