Reply to Prince Philip has died...

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Prince Philip has died..."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I find William a total ahole POS. Preening showing his kid with Philip while the biracial grandkid was chased away by the royal racist. Had to be  Kate's doing.

Should abolish the monrarchy and the tex payers should get all the property. [/quote]

Philip spent 73 years at the side of the British monarch.

Kate’s job is to do the same for William when he takes the throne.

That’s the relevance. I’m sure Philip chatted with Kate about duty. And raising the next heir.

None of this is relevant to Harry and Meghan.

George is the future King. Archie isn’t.

This isn’t a normal family dynamic. [/quote]

Why  are you  talking like  Williams  Kinghood is  guaranteed thing?  Do you want to jinx it?

He is  38!!! now

Prince  Charles is  72

The  queen is  94..

Consider that  a male takes  after the mather, and  that  Diana's  dad  died at 68!

If  the  Queen  raigns untill she is  100  .. 6  more  years..

Then  Charls  would  take over  when  he  would  be  78..

If  he   would  reign  untill  he is  100  so  for 22  years..

William  being now  38  plus  22 years  for  churls rulling  wuld  happen
when  William were  60 ears even.

That in  the  best case scenario  gives him  8 years! While coincidentially  lifespan of  younger generations  is  shrinking and  health issues  are  rampant, add to  it any future epidemics..

NOTHING IS GUARANTEED![/quote]

We’re chatting about why William’s reference of Kate and pic of George make sense. Some crazies seem to think it’s a childish dig at Harry.

William and George are heir apparent.

[b]Harry is a guy who lives in CA. 
[/b][/quote]

Do you  know  what were the odds  for  Q elisabeth  to become  a queen  IF  her  Uncle  has not abdicate,  had  a child  and  if her  father hasn't died  in his  40's???

MANY things that  were  unlike  had to  happen, and they  did.  NOBODY would predict it   whwn  Elisabeth was  a baby.

Being heir  apparent  means  possibility but not  guarantee.

LIFE happens.

[/quote]

Not really. David (king Edward) had no kids, so when he abdicated, the title went his brother Bertie, King George. Only that one thing had to happen to set the wheels in motion for Elizabeth to be in the direct line of succession. In order for Harry or Archie to be king, William AND all of his children would have to abdicate. It’s practically a designated survivor event.[/quote]
Neither you nor PP know the future. Seems unlikely but also certainly more likely for a royal family than your average one. Royal families come and go historically. Plus wasn’t uncle montebatten and his son killed by terrorists? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics