Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Costco shooter was a cop... and all 3 victims were unarmed"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Could the parents be held liable for bringing their unmedicated son into Costco?[/quote] He was an adult, so unless he was declared incompetent and his parents given legal custody of him, no, they can’t be held legally responsible. And even if they could, for what? The cop’s ER bill to check his bruise?[/quote] This has been a terrible nightmare for those parents, no question. But they used their membership to get their son into Costco and they more than likely did have some sort of guardianship over him if he was mentally incapacitated. I am NOT saying that they should be held liable for bringing him into the store, my question is COULD they be held responsible for bringing him into that store?[/quote] And my answer was to the legal question of whether they could, not the philosophical question of whether they should. Unless they had legal guardianship, they generally can’t be held responsible for his autonomous behavior.[/quote] If they did have legal guardianship then they could be held responsible?[/quote] Even then, likely not. Most of the time parental liability arises from instances where kids engage in intentional/deliberately malicious actions, not from careless, reckless, negligent, etc., behavior. If their son is sufficiently lacking in cognitive capacity that they could get guardianship, it’s hard to argue he has the cognitive capacity for that kind of malicious/willful behavior. The other theory that possibly could be pursued (if California allows it) is if he had a recent history of similar violent behavior that his parents weren’t making an effort to address and they keep taking him out without adequate supervision, but that’s a really hard one to prove. And ultimately, the guy suffered at most minor injuries, so there’s not a whole lot for him to recover to make a lawsuit worthwhile. He is going to face a civil suit from the French family, though. That’s all but certain.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics