Reply to Wall Street Journal on rampant growth in percentage of college students with “disabilities”

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Wall Street Journal on rampant growth in percentage of college students with “disabilities”"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As the parent of a child with disabilities, I have observed that there are some people who get it and some that don't.  This includes teachers and even some special education teachers.  In the pool of those that don't get it, some will eventually get it when they face it in someone with whom they have significant contact.  I have seen my own child convert teachers as he moved through the educational system.  That was quite a bit of pressure for him, but he did it admirably.  I wish the naysayers on this thread could meet my child and learn from him.

For the pp who posted about having a gap between the 25th and 75th percentiles.  That is still within average and the person is unlikely to get accommodations IME.  In fact, some tests have 'average' as low as the 16th percentile (one SD above and below the 50th percentile).  For my child, his lowest score on tests that tested his disability was in the 1st percentile (for him: RAN), and one test was ruled invalid because he scored so low.  On the other side, the scores in his areas of ability were in the 99th and above (eg critical thinking, vocabulary, background knowledge).  He needs the accommodations so that the tests accurately reflect his mastery of the material.  He has a reader and a scribe (in HS it was a person, in college it is electronic).  It takes more time to take a test with these, so he also gets extra time.  Technology is great but it is not always efficient.  Some children need extra time because it takes more time for them to bubble in the answer.  It has nothing to do with how much time it took them to get to that answer. I do not think the ability to bubble in answers quickly is a skill that relates to almost all real life work environments.

There will always be controversy about where the line is drawn - wherever it is drawn, because there will always be someone who just missed it and they will not be very far away from the person who just made it.  If the standardized test takers could figure how to go give more time to everyone without making others sit around longer when they don't need it and make it cost effective, then I foresee that the time component to standardized tests will go away.  It did for the Virginia SOLs.  [/quote]

I don't disagree with this but this doesn't describe 22% of kids or anywhere close, and there does need to consideration about to what extent accommodations -- particularly if they are very generous and given to a lot of kids -- distort the ability to accurately measure the ability of kids that don't receive them.

We aren't claiming that disabilities don't exist or that there aren't some people who are intellectually capable but need a different mechanism to show their skills.  The claim is that the system is being overused to the point of abused by marginal candidates who receive overly generous accommodations due to the wealth / influence of their parents as a method of trying to game the competition.  Obviously that's not the intent of every parent or the result in every case but it's a reality that needs to be addressed in order for the system to function properly.

Also, doing not super intellectual things quickly and accurately is important at literally every job.  It's not 100% of most jobs, but it absolutely matters. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics