Reply to Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”

The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically.  The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.

It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question.  Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?

Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat.  Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.[/quote]

Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.[/quote]
Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.[/quote]

You're missing the forest for the trees. There's a picture of this boy at 10 years old being gifted a suped up desktop computer his parents presumably gave him full access to. It is a safe bet this nerdy autistic but natively very smart and handsome kid spent the last 12 years becoming addicted to porn, gore, and falling down dark rabbit holes. The internet, including Discord chat rooms, social media, and porn, needs to be severely restricted to all kids under 18. I'd argue porn should be banned from the internet in general.

This was a smart handsome boy who should be finishing up an engineering degree, instead he falls off the track after only one semester of college? The red flags were evident 4 years ago. That's not normal for a boy with a near perfect ACT and 4.0 to quit college -- unless it's to move to SF because you founded a tech start-up.

As for 'mental health,' it's a bit early for you to speculate, isn't it? Maybe he was getting care for 'mental health,' which too often in this country is loading up teen kids with Xanax, SSRIs, and Adderall.[/quote]

Spot on[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics