Reply to Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]the surpeme court has made it legal for the government to simply snatch people off the streets and out of their homes and throw them into gulags in central America.

And if you think this stops with "illegals," think again. ANYONE is at risk.[/quote]

No.  They didn't.  They ruled 5-4 that the suit was brought in the wrong venue.  That it should have been brought in Texas, not DC.  The court ruled 9-0 that the Alien Enemy Act requires due process.  What due process?  We have to wait and see.[/quote]

Due Process can be met in a variety of ways.[/quote]

DP.  The whole point of using the AEA was to avoid due process.  The Supreme Court basically rejected that and said that due process is required.  The Supreme Court didn't outright overturn the invocation of the AEA, but they basically defanged its use.

At first glance, this looks like a win for the Trump administration.  But actually, they lost.  [/quote]

Again, it all depends on what "Due Process" means here.  It could be as simple as holding a short hearing before deportation.[/quote]

Yes, a hearing challenging nationality or belonging to tda could be due process.

The Trump administration wanted to avoid all of that using the unreviewable AEA.  The Supreme Court didn't review the AEA one way or the other but instead said it is challengeable.

Now explain the distinction between reviewable and challengeable and how that [non-existent] distinction helps the government.  Answer: it doesn't.  It is the opposite of what they wanted.  [/quote]
Use of AEA is not reviewable.  Individuals being listed as a member of the group under AEA can challenge their particular membership.  
Class action not available, only individual review.  Which is what the government conceded to begin with.
[/quote]

You do understand this is an ultra violent criminal gang, right?[/quote]
I can’t tell if you guys are really this dense or if you are pretending not to understand. No one is against gang bangers being deported.  But we are pro-due process.  Otherwise, anyone can be accused of anything and sent to a gulag in El Salvador.  Do you understand this? [/quote]
They were not deported. They were abducted. If they had been deported, they would have had due process.

We need to be more specific with our language. These people were ABDUCTED.[/quote]

He was ordered deported, why can’t you get that?  The only administrative mistake here was sending him to El Salvador.  It’s up to that country to release him or send him back (where he will promptly and lawfully get deported yet again).  [/quote]
Trump admin is paying El Salvador to jail these people. He can stop payment, and then El Salvador would let them go.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics