Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]He said it (Ratcliffe not Radcliffe). Is it true? https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/...fied-details-signal/ Warner then pointed out that Gabbard recently posted on social media that “unauthorized release of classified information is a violation of the law and will be treated as such.” Gabbard responded that “there’s a difference between inadvertent release versus careless and sloppy, malicious leaks of classified information. The second point is, there was no classified information that was” shared. Ratcliffe told lawmakers that his use of Signal to discuss the plans was authorized, addressing another point of contention raised in the fallout of Goldberg’s story. “When I was confirmed as CIA director, Signal was loaded onto my computer at the CIA as it is for most CIA officers. One of the things that I was briefed on very early, senator, was by the CIA records management folks about the use of Signal as a permissible work use,” Ratcliffe said. He said the CIA had approved signal to transmit CLASSIFIED info? If so, he just perjured himself before Congress.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics