Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "10 year old girl has to travel out of state to get abortio "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Thank goodness Republicans are going after the REAL criminal here - the Indiana doctor who shared the child's story [twitter]https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1547655938126913536?s=20&t=rFQ2IOaxIvNadcIkSYC0PQ[/twitter][/quote] Wait abortion records are public documents in Indiana????? So anyone who terminated would be public knowledge?[/quote] WTAF? [/quote] This is not surprising or anything to freak out about. The vast majority of states collect and report abortion data and have for decades. Only a handful don’t. As things are currently doesn’t mean that the individual who terminated is identified (I wouldn’t be surprised if that changes in the coming years, of course, the way things are going.) What is typically reported is the facility, patient demographics like age and marital status, gestational age, and the procedure used. This is where we get abortion statistics from. [/quote] He is trying to pull identifying data from the reports. [/quote] I’m not saying what he’s doing is right, but a PP said “so anyone who terminated would be public knowledge?” And no, that is not true. He’s saying no abortion on a 10 year old patient was reported. Demographic info like age is required to report just like it is in all but a handful of states. So either it never happened, or the doctor failed to report it. [/quote] Oh my god, you’re still debating this? It happened! It happens across the country, probably not commonly but I’d say once is way too much. It happened and your sht bag party made it worse, is making it worse for the child, her family and the doctor who probably saved her life. So instead of grasping at straws about why “nuh-uh this didn’t happen,” just go sit on the couch and cry over the fact that you’re making life miserable for women, on purpose. Just go sit down and be quiet and think. People like you changing your minds can stop the creeping fascism. [/quote] Slow your roll. I am firmly pro-choice, probably more extremely pro-choice than most here. I support abortion or termination of pregnancy at any time on demand for any reason. Even if this case was fully fabricated I honestly don’t care as forced birthers need to understand the consequences of their actions. [b]I was simply pointing out that the fact that Indiana collects and reports this data is not a reason to freak out. Most states do and have for a long time.[/b] You’re right, I missed the part of the letter that stated the report may not be showing up due to a lag in the system. Mea culpa. This person should not be abusing the data exists in an attempt to punish the doctor who performed the abortion or identify the child. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics