Reply to Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just you wait till the next elections.

Savor ‘victory’ till then.  The progressives will be the Democrats’ Achilles Heel.  TJ is but a skirmish in the bigger battle to ensure schools are focused on education not virtue signaling.  [/quote]

Youngkin should just go ahead and set up the "Regional Governing Board" consisting of reps from all the participating jurisdictions (which is how TJ should be governed) which he is able to do under the current statute and put the control in that body instead of the FCPS.[/quote]

And FCPS should take back its school and make it local. I'm fine if there's no TJ. [/quote]

Some would be bummed. It is aspirational but the majority would be better off without it since it takes up a lot of time and resources that would be better spend on everyone instead of a few wealthy kids who will do fine anywhere since their parents will see to it.[/quote]

Unfortunately the progressives believe that all meritocracy is elitist and should be abandoned.

When there is a belief that equality of outcome trumps equality of opportunity, you are ringing the death knell of any meritocracy.  And that does not auger well for the American Dream.  But that is the New American Dream of our esteemed Progressives.  If they can’t have it, nobody else can have it.  [/quote]

Why does one need to trump the other? Both matter. Or maybe put another way, almost every agrees with the idea of equality of opportunity on the face of it, but that alone is not enough. When you have sustained unequal outcomes for large chunks of the population over time then it's a pretty good indicator that what seems like equal opportunity on its face very probably has some underlying systemic bias or inequality and you probably need to think a layer deeper than "BuT tHeY aLl TaKe ThE sAmE tEsT!!!"[/quote]

Exactly. As always, conservatives and those who champion their causes always major in defining the terms of the argument, and in this case, the attempt is to claim that academic merit can only be achieved through standardized exam scores or through performance in academic competitions.[/quote]

Not the only way, but the best way.  This is how the entire world does this - by a standardized test that everyone takes and then they are ranked against each other.  [/quote]

Don't know about all this but defining merit in terms of a test that many people simply buy seems to favor the wealthy and unscrupulous. [/quote]

Hard to see how a less objective approach will be more scrupulous.  It’s ripe with the potential for abuse and ultimately will be gamed even more by those who learn how to play the Oppression Olympics. [/quote]

When we shell out $10K for TJ prep, we deserve those spots![/quote]

Just to be clear the Asian kids in these prep classes are only competing with other Asian kids. They don't need the prep to compete with others. Not because they are smarter but most non-Asians just don't care that much. Of course you know all that. That's why the focus was not to create a non-standard test but to just eliminiate it. Only way to win the game is to just remove the hoop. Diversity was also not the goal - because there were other ways to do that while keeping the test. It was just to divide and rule and some white parents getting their kids a 26% leg up. [/quote]

....what in the world are you talking about? They're not competing with other Asian kids. It's not like the previous process was limited to Asian kids - they represented a little more than 50% of the application pool and that's all.

Creating a non-standardized test that isn't vetted by multiple outlets is extremely problematic for a public school. That's not an option because it is too easy to attack on legal grounds.

What other ways do you suggest for improving diversity while keeping the test? Racial quotas are expressly unconstitutional.

And where in the world do you get 26% from? Poor Asians benefited far more from the admissions changes than white, Black, or Hispanic students.[/quote]

Have a test and add experience factors instead of removing the test altogether. Removing test altogether only helps white kids.

26% is how many more white kids got in without test. [/quote]

prep classes or not, if there is a test asian kids will do well. which is why you guys removed the test. it is obvious and as per the remarks found in discovery. Asian kids went down 26% white kids went up 26%. that's what is the most galling thing. not blacks and hispanics getting more seats. all power to them. [/quote]

Can you provide a citation for those numbers? What I read indicates your numbers are wrong. Black and Hispanic kids went up 2X-3X while Asian students went down a little but that was because they had made up 75% of all seats previously.[/quote]

http://www.fcag.org/TJHSSTClassof2025AdmissionsPressRelease.pdf[/quote]

In a nutshell the report paints a very diff picture than what the previous poster claimed.

• Female students increased from 41.80% (2020-21) to 46.00%.
• Black students increased from 1.23% (2020-21) to 7.09%.
• Hispanic students increased from 3.29% (2020-21) to 11.27%.
• White students increased from 17.70% (2020-21) to 22.36%.
• Asian students continue to constitute a majority of the class at 54.36%.[/quote]

Thanks for shedding light on this![/quote]

Previous poster said the same thing. That whites increased by 26% and Asians decreased by 26%. The fact remains that Asians were wilfully targeted and the stated intent was to reduce them.  The fact was upheld in court by a federal judge. Judgment has been appealed by FCPS. And while the appeal is going on, FCPS has gone ahead with a no-test, proxy points given to race admissions process. Racial redistribution and increases in white enrollment achieved. But at what cost for TJ, the institution? [/quote]

The PP is just making up fictions to support their grievance fantasy. THe actual data is posted above and is nothing like that.[/quote]

I can't help it if you can't do the math. [/quote]

you did math, but it was irrelevant and intentionally misleading math[/quote]

Yup. Why did PP only share the % changes for two races? 
[/quote]

Because they're trying to create a bullsh!t narrative that the biggest beneficiaries of the admissions changes were white folks. They have their own Great Replacement Theory (remember how C4TJ is adjacent to white supremacy?) that the point of these changes is to replace Asians with whites. And the reality is that Black students AND poor Asian students increased by more than a whopping 600%.[/quote]

Exactly. 
[/quote]

You are making no sense.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics