Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "APS Elementary Planning Mtg at Swanson - Option 1 in, Option 2 out, McKinley Moms out of contro"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP, but you could have more VPI at ATS and less at, say, Carlin Springs or Hoffman Boston. [/quote] Two questions: 1) why not more VPI at all underenrolled schools like D, J, N, etc.? 2) do more VPI families stay at ATS through 5th than at other schools like maybe Jamestown, if so, why? [/quote] APS found they couldn't fill Montessori preK at Nottingham. Those sites are the farthest from, and least accessible by, those who qualify for VPI. While it may be easy to say put option program "x" at Tuckahoe v McKinley or Discovery v ATS site; countywide accessibility is a factor in good location decisions. It is not strictly all about numbers of open seats in a given location. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics