Reply to RM Cluster Overcrowding?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "RM Cluster Overcrowding?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We all must take a stand against extremist [b]pro-development zealots [/b]like Mark Pierzchala and advocate against additional overcrowding for this cluster.  Please write the mayor and Councilman Pierzchala early and often.   He is going to destroy this cluster.[/quote]

Shifting IB out or [b]putting Beall outside of RM[/b]... For just building more condos?

Their views are actually not pro-development. Their views are simply building more condos. Pro development will look like making sure that we have enough school capacity, enough public facility, enough roads etc.

I do see if citizens don't speak up, RM cluster is going to get destroyed.[/quote]

But putting Twinbrook outside of RM is ok?[/quote]

Developer who testified and trying to push was making a case for building more in TB zone.  Same developer stated that 80% of his development in that area will go to WJ(future Woodward). It may make sense to  shift entire TB to Woodward or Wheaton. That way more condos can be built in TB.

Moving Beall out should be looked as well, but there was no developer lobbying for building in Beall zone. I guess each community has to decide for themselves what they want. They want more condos or good education. I am in RP and I don't want more condos anywhere. I want minimum decent education for my kids. 120% itself is pretty bad, let's not make it worse by making a policy change to build lots of condos in RM cluster.

Something has to be done about the siitaution if citizens simply wants more condos. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics