Reply to RHONY Season 10

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "RHONY Season 10"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is no one going to bring up Lou being sued by her ex AND her children? It sounds like Lou, in effect, stole from her kids. This is very disappointing to hear. It has been sweet seeing her son and daughter supporting her, but I guess not any more. [/quote]

I can't help but think there are some mistakes and misunderstandings here. I think she may have thought that taking the money and investing it in another property was a good idea (remember, she bought that property before she started seeing Tom; her kids clearly knew she purchased that property, as they were living there with her). Where I think things got tangled up was when she married Tom and they renovated together, and when her minor children grew up and then moved out.

Anyway, the other thing I don't like about this situation is that clearly LuAnn has been the primary parent this whole time. The count just seems to breeze in and out of their lives for visits, and now he's kicking up trouble for the woman who raised his children. The whole thing is just a mess, and sad.[/quote]

First, she didn’t primarily raise the children.  Her nanny did. In one interview on the street Her nanny said in nyc the nannies raise the children. The kids also mentioned something about that. Ramona also said something like that to Luann - how she was always leaving her kids. Not that Ramona’s an expert except for the fact that Luann was upset bc kids should be off limits - not bc it wasn’t true. She instead said in her interview she wants adult time (around the time her kids were upset she was going out again and she wouldn’t be eating with the kids. She instead went into the city with her niece to see a new band.

Second, presumably Luann’s violation was pretty clear for the lawsuit to happen. Also presumably they (kids, the count, a lawyer) said something before the lawsuit (show that you followed the agreement and she couldn’t). Regardless, she can’t just revise what a contract requires. The count probably agreed to giving her the real estate but only to use and provided the kids for the money from the sale, in a trust for them when it sold. Unless I’m mistaken, she came out with no statement or counter suit saying she wasn’t in violation of the contract or had no obligation to do what the lawsuit claimed. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics