Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am on the jury. [/quote]

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there. [/quote]
If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.[/quote]
this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all. [/quote]

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax. [/quote]

they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax. This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty... [/quote]

No. They said their DH has jury duty on 10/20. Nothing about jury selection for a specific trial. Do you understand how jury duty works? The man STILL has jury duty that day. There are dozens of cases on the docket. [/quote]

do you understand that you are calling me out and saying Im being rude while speaking in a degrading way to me? Yes I understand how jury works, and jury selection did not start, and it doesnt matter if a room of people were asked to show up, the actual selection process starts now at the new date I listed on January 13th. It doesn't so much matter that I misunderstood what they said and reacted slightly. There is no need to police what I am sharing and to call me out while also then doing the actual thing you are saying I did. It doesnt make much sense to do this, and I would ask you to stop monitoring how I am posting and focus on your own please. Why not worry about the real things going on here, the important things and not about personally regulating other posters? My reactions related to reading posts in this forum over all that were casting a bad light on a defense that is fighting for the justice of two murdered people. I think one thing might be more important to focus on than if I am a bit reactionary or even confused about what a poster was trying to say. Is being so right more important than the grief those who might be reading this or posting these things might be feeling right now. This is a double murder case of people who have friends and family, here now, in this moment... reading and posting this. [/quote]

I’m a new poster.  You missed the word “if” in the initial post about the woman’s spouse. (She said IF jury selection had processed, indicating that it had not.)  It’s okay.  It’s also okay for you to say “whoops—I misread the post!” And then everyone moves on.  I feel for you because I think your heart  is in the right place but I hope you don’t communicate this way in your real life.  It’s okay to have misread the post.  It’s also okay to admit you made a mistake and then move on.  I’m saying this only because it you were my friend or daughter I would want you to learn that this is not the best way to communicate/respond.  
Best wishes to you and thank you for keeping people updated on the trial. [/quote]
Ok,Dad [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics