Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am on the jury. [/quote]

It has not been chosen yet. But I sure hope someone from here is on there. [/quote]
If it had actually started on 10/20 as planned, my DH was called for jury duty that day.[/quote]
this is NOT accurate. The new trial date with jury selection start on January 13th of next year. This date was decided today in court. There has NOT been a jury selected as of yet at all. [/quote]

DP- the PP was simply saying their DH was scheduled for jury DUTY that day. Not that he had been selected for the jury for this case. Relax. [/quote]

[b]they suggested that jury selection started, no one needs to relax.[/b] This is not a relaxed subject for many people who care about justice and truth, and who care about Christine and Joe, and their families. So I said what I said and I am not sorry, and I don't need to relax. Perhaps you should stop relaxing and take this seriously instead. It never feels good when someone tells you to relax, people are allowed to be passionate about what matters to them. This matters to Me, I dont need to behave, or be silent, I dont need to joke about it or be pretty... [/quote]

They did not, and while your posts are informative you're going to end up talking to yourself if you continue to just be rude and attacking everyone.[/quote]

I attacked no one. I was told to relax, which is not appropriate in this case. Maybe I should relax but I still don't need lectures and I wasn't rude. Should I just be silent and not inform people about what is actually happening in court? That seems like a mistake. Perhaps using less emotion might be a good plan and perhaps you are right however it's a very emotional topic for me. I am doing my very best to interject appropriately when I can see clearly there are messages intended to intentionally mislead the public by both the press and the defense. In the presses case it is to get people to pay attention, and they are suggesting inproper and inaccurate things from the prosecution as a team, and the police department itself. I think these things are serious and so I react because of that. Clearly I misunderstood what the one poster said. However I am sincere about what I said and why about the case. I do care and that is why I am doing my best to not call names or attack posters. This is a public forum and I am simply trying to be clear about what I see is happening and doing my best to convey it in an appropriate way. I make mistakes, but I am not being openly rude. I see attacks as name calling or being crude in someway. I have not done this at all. Being asked to relax is a trigger for most people. I think the information I have given about the case is more important than always having a perfect tone. I will try to improve but why must I walk on eggshells in this way when my intentions are clearly to advocate for a fair trial and to tell the truth as I see it. It sure is different than the narrative the defense is attempting to create, or the click bait that journalism or court tv creates to increase viewers and eyes. At least what I seek is justice. Cut me some slack my filter is at least honest and humanitarian rather than manipulative, self serving, or dishonest. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics