Reply to 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "2028 Girls Lacrosse"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think more importantly Ivies and high D1 (ND/Stanford/USC, Hopkins) are realizing public school girls are not academically prepared for college.[/quote]Sure, that's why ND has 15 publics on the roster and Yale has 24.  Not checking any others. And it's why they all carry big football teams.  We can only hope your daughter(s) don't turn out as elitist, sanctimonious and unaware of the world around them as you.[/quote]

How many of those public school girls are from the DMV? One?[/quote]What does that even mean?  What do you think we are, Mississippi? You said public school girls are not academically  prepared.  Which argument do you want to run on?[/quote]

You seem to be under the impression that public school girls FROM THE DMV have the same chance as being recruited to an Ivy/high academic school as the private school girls in the area. Look at both ND and Yale's rosters again. Besides one girl from Yale (Langley grad) all the girls recruited from the DMV/Baltimore area were from private schools. [/quote]You can look at the entirety of a discussion by hitting quote and then scrolling up and down.  
If you are the OP of this one, then it looks like you have the traits I pointed out.  And now, we can add on either an easily confused or dishonest chaser.  
The conversation I was in was in reply to the OP (you?) stating high academics realize public school girls aren't academically prepared.  Only YOU are attempting to swerve the conversation somewhere else. 
And if it WAS you as OP, just own it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics