Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://x.com/jkbjournalist/status/1275510424084021249

Remember those photos of Mr. Barak visiting Epstein’s New York apartment, either after he was arrested or after he died?

Looks like Israeli Prime minister Ehud Barak was busy beating and raping Virginia Guffrie. [/quote]

Dershowitz is playing a political game.  Barak did business with Epstein and was probably involved. He's on that particular list, which is entirely democrats, because Barak is in opposition to Netanyahu.

Remember that Dersh is on the list himself and was the guy digging up dirt on Guiffre and the other victims.[/quote]

I think Dershowitz is worst of the worst in terms of character, and that as a Zionist who has decided he’s the worlds most hated Martha’s Vineyard resident, but nothing about that pleading is really a “political game.” Dershowitz is himself conservative (at best a contrarian civil libertarian and the nightmare of a “too smart” lawyer, who physically and legally in terms of maneuvers abused his first time til she killed herself over custody issues.) but so is Prince Andrew on that list, and we know to a certainty he did what he was accused of (photo, reputed payment of 12 million pounds).

I believe every name listed accurately lists a man who raped Giuffre or participated in an orgy with underage and of age abused and trafficked women. So yes - I believe Senators Mitchell and Richardson are in there along with Clinton, and Trump, and Andrew, and Ehud Barak.

This story is an important story to me. It provides a sense of the kind of abuse many of us don’t see. We’re in the understory, and we are all susceptible to biases where we think “our people” can’t do heinously abusive things. I’m not that deluded anymore. Michelle Goldberg (liberal oped NYT columnists) wrote back in 2016 a single column that perhaps there was something to the myriad Bill Clinton assault allegations, and that maybe we who voted for him (like me) should stop laughing at phrases like “bimbo eruption” and start thinking big about why exactly so many “opposite” people are tainted by this.[/quote]

I don’t know any democrat in real life who would have the slightest hesitation about dem names being published. Of course there are dems implicated-throw the book at them!

Would it be very discouraging to find that a dem that shocked me was on the list (meaning not Clinton, etc)-yes! But of course they should still be named.

I feel like that’s a key difference between democrats and republicans at the moment. (For example, I don’t know anyone who wasn’t completely disgusted by the Hunter Biden pardon.) [/quote]

Of course but I find the self-congratulatory crap about this so pointless. Yes. I’m not Trump or MAGA, yes, release all the names.
I don’t think there’s a point to your point. PP talking Dershowitz also had no fundamental point.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics