Reply to Jefferson Academy Kool-Aid

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Jefferson Academy Kool-Aid"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]you can make a school look better if you add 50 high-SES students to 150 low-SES students, but that doesn't make it automatically a better school for the 150 low-SES students who were already there.[/quote]

Common sense says otherwise. Involve dozens of pesky upper middle-class parents in a school community and good quickly comes of the leadership roles they play there.  Well-heeled parents waste no time setting about raising money, identifying and objecting to questionable practices by admins and teachers and pushing to oust the lowest adult performers, organizing school events, creating and sitting on hiring panels, lobbying DCPS for inputs, writing external grant proposals and forming partnerships with supporting organizations, asking for at and above grade-level courses etc. etc.  Hence, the school becomes better overall, like Brent has in the last decade. It's worth prioritizing attracting as many well-educated families as possible to a school serving poor kids, period. Just look at studies of the college track records of KIPP graduates versus those of high-performing low SES kids who attended socioeconomically diverse schools all the way up.  The KIPP graduates drop out of college at roughly triple the rate of low SES kids who attended high schools that were overwhelmingly high SES.  Isolating poor minority kids in economically segregated schools in the name of "fairness" (e.g. not permitting test-in school-within-a-school middle school programs) is a really bad idea.  http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2011/06/kipps-underwhelming-college-completion.html

That's why when Rhee started rewarding schools with high test scores it made no sense, encourage cheating, and did not nothing to want to make teachers work at schools EOTP that also had economically disadvantaged kids and low test scores.

[/quote]

and yet even at the higher performing schools with " pesky upper middle-class parents" an astonishing achievement gap still exists.  The overall results only look better as a whole because the struggling students comprise a smaller percentage of the school population.[/quote][/quote]

Aside from being 5 years out of date (an enormous chunk of time in the short history of charter schools), the quoted article is unreliable on its face.  Asking that source about KIPP (or any charter school, for that matter) is like asking the Redskins organization about the Cowboys, or Salon.com about Capitalism.

It's impossible to get any straight information from them whatsoever.  Their hostility to change and defense of the status quo is like the doctors who refused to condemn smoking and claimed it had no proven causal effect on cancer.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics