Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Jefferson Academy Kool-Aid"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]you can make a school look better if you add 50 high-SES students to 150 low-SES students, but that doesn't make it automatically a better school for the 150 low-SES students who were already there.[/quote] Common sense says otherwise. Involve dozens of pesky upper middle-class parents in a school community and good quickly comes of the leadership roles they play there. Well-heeled parents waste no time setting about raising money, identifying and objecting to questionable practices by admins and teachers and pushing to oust the lowest adult performers, organizing school events, creating and sitting on hiring panels, lobbying DCPS for inputs, writing external grant proposals and forming partnerships with supporting organizations, asking for at and above grade-level courses etc. etc. Hence, the school becomes better overall, like Brent has in the last decade. It's worth prioritizing attracting as many well-educated families as possible to a school serving poor kids, period. Just look at studies of the college track records of KIPP graduates versus those of high-performing low SES kids who attended socioeconomically diverse schools all the way up. The KIPP graduates drop out of college at roughly triple the rate of low SES kids who attended high schools that were overwhelmingly high SES. Isolating poor minority kids in economically segregated schools in the name of "fairness" (e.g. not permitting test-in school-within-a-school middle school programs) is a really bad idea. http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2011/06/kipps-underwhelming-college-completion.html That's why when Rhee started rewarding schools with high test scores it made no sense, encourage cheating, and did not nothing to want to make teachers work at schools EOTP that also had economically disadvantaged kids and low test scores. [/quote] and yet even at the higher performing schools with " pesky upper middle-class parents" an astonishing achievement gap still exists. The overall results only look better as a whole because the struggling students comprise a smaller percentage of the school population.[/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics