Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Fed Government Shutdown 2025: non-political thread "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]at this point i think the dems should cut their losses and pass the cr and enable the legislative branch of govt function again, however terribly it may be. it's better than zero.[/quote] Absolutely not. Once the populous actually sees how much their ACA premiums go up on Nov 1 they’ll understand what the Dems are fighting for and how corrupt the GOP is [/quote] So the only way ACA can survive is through massive subsidies? Sounds like it needs to be reformed or killed.[/quote] Can we say the same thing for Space X? It can only survive with government subsidies? [/quote] What subsidies is Space X specifically receiving? Payment for services rendered are not subsidies. Now if you were talking about ULA... That was basically the Government paying for nothing.[/quote] There’s an implicit subsidy… the federal government is the anchor tenant that has allowed SpaceX to survive. [/quote] LOL, payment for services rendered is not a subsidy. Keep trying. [/quote] Do you own stock in one of Musk’s companies? You sound very protective of them. [/quote] Nah, just find liberal derangement over Space X and Musk to be amusing. [/quote]m Most Americans don’t care whether SpaceX and Tesla exist. Let the market decide. If they fail, they fail. 🤷♀️[/quote] NASA invested in commercializing space via the SpaceX company, which provided it with capital and authorization for various contracts that wouldn’t have been possible otherwise. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2025/09/nasa-spacex-elon-musk-ambitions/683559/[/quote] I'd like to see a referendum on spending tax money on going to Mars. I can't imagine most U.S. citizens are interested in paying more for healthcare for the sake of getting to Mars. Like sure, I'll pay higher premiums so we can send a few spaceships to Mars in a few decades. So worth it to the average citizen wanting to retire by 65. [/quote] This is unbelievably obtuse. Federal spending on healthcare is about $2,000B per year. Federal spending on human space flight is roughly $10B per year. Are you seriously suggesting asking to compare things that are imbalanced by a factor of 200? Which would you rather have, a Ferrari or a Hot Wheels?[/quote] The salaries of federal workers are a drop in the bucket next to the total national debt. [b]But alas, we have to start somewhere, correct, [/b]even if it’s a drop in the bucket? [/quote] Let’s start by not sending billions to Argentina, Israel and Egypt. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics