Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "The DMV needs a YIMBY revolution "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]More Thrive-esque non-answer answers. https://montgomeryplanning.org/planning/housing/attainable-housing-strategies-initiative/attainable-housing-strategies-what-were-hearing/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR131PtnV3M1nYSqtK0EP7jBzM7C2oq0y4UDW0drpVOCIeAou6mrLuQ696k_aem_Wh6uNhsMWIyGMAGgg9Vl_Q They are clearly collecting information from these threads :) At least they are sweating it a little.[/quote] The very first answer is misleading, which is probably why they don’t link to the growth and infrastructure policy or the proposed reductions in impact fees. Planning is recommending massive cuts in impact fees, which will either delay road and school construction more or require large property tax increases to offset increased borrowing costs. It’s just the same old same old from Planning. They seem incapable of presenting unbiased information and instead engage in over the top advocacy every time. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
