Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Another issue is polygraphs depend on your heart rate and bp and physiological response to questions but given he had a missing wife and was being interrogated, there’s probably no real way he would’ve passed with calm body language anyway and the cops (already against him) knew that and wanted to sink him with the test [/quote] I bet in hindsight Scott regrets not taking the polygraph. [/quote] I think so too, but the polygraph may have been a set up. The cop didn’t like him from day 1 and would’ve asked the questions intentionally to trip him up. “did you see Laci before she last disappeared?” The answer would’ve been yes. “Did you and Laci have a good marriage or any marital problems recently?” “Did you and Laci ever fight?” Every married couple argues from time to time. “Did you wash your fishing clothes after Lacis disappearance ?” Brocchini was not going to play the questions fairly. I’m curious to know how the burglars passed the polygraph when their initial statements were lies. One of the guys said the burglary happened on December 27th (a lie) and they also insisted they had nothing to do with the missing woman with the baby. So why lie and say it happened on December 27th if they had not bring to do with it? It’s on police notes as December 27th and December 24th but the Medinas came back from their trip on the 26th. [/quote] Honestly, who cares? He had his day in court, lost and all of his appeals and requests are denied. Scott is screwed. Accept it. [/quote] Ugh, you can be Scott. Do you not get that it’s bigger than Scott Peterson? If the last person you saw disappeared suddenly, you will be on the police radar and anything about your actions during their observations can make you a suspect and you won’t have any clue. If your child runs away, you will be a suspect even if you have nothing to do with it. If your son’s girlfriend disappears, he’ll be a suspect. The system is supposed to work the way the founders wanted when it comes to presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Do you know what means? We aren’t supposed to have cops, prosecutor journalists like Nancy Grace, or tabloids convicting people in the news before their day in court. [/quote] Then the Scotts of the world shouldn’t act so guilty. Face it, he did this to himself.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics