Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The hearing regarding the emergency stay request is Friday 3/11 at 10am Below is the link to the brief filed by plaintiffs opposing the stay https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.505154/gov.uscourts.vaed.505154.148.0.pdf[/quote] I stopped reading when PLF made the argument that the Admissions Office was free to use the previous admissions process to select students instead of developing a new process. They plainly are not as two of the exams that were previously used no longer exist and developing a plan for assessing the Quant-Q, using it to cull a list of semifinalists, and then gathering teacher recommendations would almost certainly drive the process well into the fall. [/quote] I actually love the idea of transitioning TJ to a 10th-12th or even 11th-12th grade school. There are virtually no classes that freshman or sophomores take that are not offered at the base schools. Just do not seat the class of 2026 until next year. Expand the other classes if needed using PSATs/GPAs. Done, simple. [/quote] This is an idea what should at least be discussed by the school board. It would help solve the problem that there are waaay more kids interested and qualified for the advanced TJ courses than there are current slots. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics