Reply to Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think Trump is sharing his orange make up with Stone.  He's got it on and there is a big line where he missed a spot applying it.  Maybe he should get some tips from Mr. Trump.[/quote]

Liberal:  I can’t argue with the truth so I’m going to say something stupid [/quote]

Ummm, what?  This is just a comment about Stone's stupid make up.  Thought it would liven the debate or at the very least make someone chuckle.  It is a bit ridiculous defending this media hound, don't ya think?[/quote]

Your comment was beyond vapid. I'm not defending anyone - I'm simply interested in equal application under the law. The FBI seems to be weaponized for the Democrats, as I don't see Abedin nor Mills being perp-walked.[/quote]
Maybe Abedin didn't commit any crimes or lie to the FBI.  Has that thought even occurred to you?[/quote]

OMG, the stupid just radiates off the screen:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/breaking-report-top-hillary-aide-huma-abedin-gave-false-statements-to-fbi-agents-in-2017-interview/

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

And for the people that missed it the first time I posted it:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html
[/quote]

Yes, the stupid radiates from the screens of idiots linking to thegatewaypundit and daily caller. Why don’t you find some normal sources? Yours promulgate pizzagate and Jade helm conspiracies. Seriously, you are brainwashed and you’re too dunning-Kruger to see it.[/quote]
+1 The sources are unreliable, and themselves are lying or Dunning-Krueger victims.  I look at Abedin's actual F-302 the way a prosecutor or defense lawyer would, and it is not a prosecutable case. Anyone who thinks she is lying makes an unwarranted assumption about her meaning.  Any 3rd rate defense lawyer could drive a truck through that assumption.  I'd explain it, but Dunning-Krueger PP who called me stupid would not understand it.[/quote]

Again, you ignore the Chicago Tribune. But of course you do. Brennan thought she and Mills were lying but I guess he's not nearly as smart as you are. Narcissistic much?[/quote]
The Chicago Tribune published an opinion piece by a National Review columnist.[/quote]

And?[/quote]
As in, it's opinion piece by a conservative columnist, not a news article. [/quote]

These idiots sit around all day watching FoxNews thinking that it’s all news, not opinions, because it’s called FoxNEWS.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics