Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Concerning the news report that a FFX police officer doing digital forensics concluded Christine was behind the FetLife profile and communicated with JR (and that said report was reviewed and validated by another LE agency). First I totally believe B and the au pair plotted and committed these crimes. But can anyone out there elaborate a bit on digital forensics? Namely, without testimonial collaboration from a human being, how can investigator determine with any accuracy which person was behind the digital trail. In other words, how would the digital trail alone identify one person especially as a married couple have access to each others’ devices. [/quote]

It can be determined the likely times Christine could have been on devices and where they made. In addition in this case it was her family and friends that said they did not believe Christine wrote in the way they believed she would write. Meaning her choice of words and writing style. It didn't relate to her personality but writing style that caused people to come forward. Of course they also didn't see it as her likely behavior, though it was really the choice of words used to communicate. That's what I have read anyway about this case. it would and is impossible for the IT forensics to be looked at by one person early on and not have the idea that it was Christine. It was only after time and looking more deeply that the digital forensics revealed something different after people came forward and the communications were more closely analyzed. In nearly all  cases that are investigated properly there are many theories about any case. It is also normal within a police force to have movement of the officers and detectives.

I agree with the pervious poster who said they thought it was a tactic used by the defense to cause doubt and conspiracy. The lead detective in this case stayed on the entire time. When he testified in court he said that he had had other theories early on but they had evolved as they got further in the investigation. So his earlier believe that the communications were from Christine were a normal assumption until he learned otherwise based on testimonies, and other factors. I do think the defense will attempt to blame the police investigation, the prosecution, and the two victims JR and CB as much as possible. That's what they do, don't be fooled folks! [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics