Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What is a FACT is that MLSN has moved from a) BY for sure, to b) rethink about it. According to our club, it has been p2p clubs push what is making MLSN reconsidering the situation. Let’s remember that MLS academies are vastly outnumbered by p2p clubs in the MLSN ecosystem. [/quote] We assume they wanted 'BY for sure' (and that is likely) but I do not know anyone who actually has ever heard, one way or the other, [i]anything[/i] from MLSN on this. No clubs know anything (anything you have heard from a club is just that, 2nd hand at best), and the MLSN2 clubs (who this would really impact) are completely in the dark. Let's not forget, they basically doubled in size with these new MLSN2 clubs and have now just left them completely out to dry. WTF. [/quote] There are some MLSN clubs who have decided to go SY for all their teams next year regardless of what MLSN announces. [/quote] This is why it will be so so hard for MLSN to stay BY right now. Maybe these clubs stay a year because it is too late to change. But if MLSN stays BY, they will soon be gone. Yeah some of these may be smaller clubs who cant create their own feeder league. And yeah, these might not be the top clubs. But there will be a lot of them. And that would be a whole lot of $$ gone[/quote] NOPE The only reason MLSN might want to run a SY league in whatever from it might happen. Is so ECNL and other leagues have an easy way to switch to MLSN/GA. MLS needs to make on boarding as easy as possible. Once clubs are under the umbrella they can create a BY team.[/quote] You make no sense. Is this MLSN guy again[/quote] No, it’s the guy who doesn’t know how mlsnext is structured. [/quote] I know how MLS Next is structured What needs to happen is for MLS to create a seperate 2nd Tier league that is SY that basically mirrors ECNL. Thhis is what clubs want. They want the to be associated with MLS but they dont want all the hassle of fielding a highly competitive team. Fine, split the league into a 1st tier thats BY and a 2nd tier thats SY. The different leagues can still play each other at events. Its just that one or the other will need to play up 6 months. But with biobanding whats the difference?[/quote] They already have two tiers. Biobanding does not address this and that’s been discussed before. The league does not want to go SY, it is the clubs that want to go SY. Have you looked at a map of the location of mlsnext clubs? Are you aware of the travel involved? There won’t be enough clubs who want to stay BY to make your idea work, staying BY is a headache the majority of clubs don’t want to deal with.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics