Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It isn’t just Democrats who are fighting for this guy; the courts are as well. The law is in his favor; he can’t be deported without due process.[/quote] Perhaps, but define due process? It's not clear what that entails. This was a political move by Bukele and helps Trump. Garcia will not be released by Bukele. The order of protection will likely be lifted based on official El Salvador statements that the country is much safer now and there is no risk of harm. The Trump administration will use its executive discretion to justify deportation (whatever the law or regulations allow). An immigration hearing will be held, likely at the US embassy, because Bukele will not allow Garcia to leave the country (and he has no diplomatic status). Remote hearings are allowed under current statute and regulations. Bottom line, he will get his due process but likely never return to the US. The story will continue to dominate the news cycle, distracting from the tariff turmoil, and further allow Democrats to tie themselves to immigration as and issue for the mid terms in 2026. [/quote] [b]He was seen by two separate courts in 2019 and they agreed he was deportable and not eligible for asylum.[/b] He has had due process. There was an error sending him to El Salvador but to say he didn’t have due process as the illegal he is, is laughable. [/quote] Are you deliberately lying or just grossly misinformed? "In order to justify the detention and potential deportation, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) submitted a Gang Field Interview Sheet (GFIS) to immigration court. According to Abrego Garcia’s petition last month, the GFIS police submitted explained that “the only reason to believe Plaintiff Abrego Garcia was a gang member was that he was wearing a Chicago Bulls hat and a hoodie; and that a confidential informant advised that he was an active member of MS-13 with the Westerns clique.” The “Western” clique of MS-13 “operates in Brentwood, Long Island, in New York, a state that Plaintiff Abrego Garcia has never lived in,” the petition read. The Trump administration has insisted that because[b] two immigration judges denied Abrego Garcia bail during his 2019 detention and asylum proceedings[/b], he is an adjudicated member of MS-13. [b]An immigration judge ultimately ruled that Abrego Garcia — who has consistently denied any gang affiliation — had provided “credible responses to the questions asked,” that his “testimony was internally consistent, externally consistent with his asylum application and other documents, and appeared free of embellishment,” and that “he provided substantial documentation buttressing his claims” of persecution in El Salvador by Barrio 18, which continued to harass members of his family who fled to Guatemala. The judge imposed a “withholding from removal” order, [/b]which prohibited his deportation to El Salvador." rollingstone.com [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics