Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Mclean record for boys is  awful.... have you seen? Brave boys have better results. Girls are about the same.
[/quote]

UHM let's state some true facts please. here is the 2023/4 record for the boys teams...Union gains no advantage with Brave. They dillute their brand if anything and if they are not careful there will lose players who don't want to deal with the mess that this will be. If its true there was pressure to merge due to 'record', ECNL needs to start looking at bottom ranked teams in NC--why for example do 3 clubs have 2 ECNL teams and then play each other. 1 at the top and 1 at the bottom. That's where they should have started the culling not forcing a merger that creates logistical headaches.

Brave 2007 6 wins, 6 losses, 1 draw (ranked 8)
Union 2007 5 wins, 7 losses, 1 draw (ranked 10)

[b]Brave 2008 0 wins 13 losses (ranked 16)[/b]
Union 2008 7 wins, 2 losses 4 draws (ranked 5)
[b]
Brave 2009 1 win, 11 losses, 1 draw  (ranked 16)[/b]
Union 2009 4 wins, 7 losses, 2 draws (ranked 10)

Brave 2010 5 wins, 5 losses, 3 draws (ranked 10)
Union 2010 4 wins, 7 losses, 1 draw (ranked 12)

[b]Brave 2011- 2 wins, 11 losses (ranked 14)[/b]
Union 2011 3 wins, 10 losses (ranked 12)[/quote]

Looks like two mediocre clubs.  Combination unlikely to create a good club, but it won’t be worse and you’ll have eliminated one doormat. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics