Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "New opposition petition to the Maury-Miner boundary proposal from DME"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sorry to pivot the conversation, but I just listened to the DME recording and scrolled to the section on the recommendation for the cluster working group to begin no earlier to 2027. You can clearly hear a short discussion on why that timeframe does not work and DME seemed to make a note of it, possibly moving the working group to one year from now, so 2025. Giving time for the Miner principal to acclimate does not make sense given the constant principal turnover there - this would push the working group out indefinitely. One year from now would be sufficient. Second, principals are expected to start their jobs prepared on day one, so giving time to acclimate doesn't make sense. I guess we'll find out what is said at the Maury meeting tomorrow.[/quote] Well, the merger will not happen because DME realized that Maury parents will move. This is just to save face now.[/quote] Advisory Committee member here, and I will respond to this quickly and share that this is not in fact how any decisions are being made. There are a few more community meetings, and one more meeting as a whole group next month. Then once our draft is finalized, it is still up to the Mayor what/if/how different recommendations are implemented. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics