Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Asian American student with 1590 SAT score blames affirmative action for rejections from 6 colleges"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Huge cultural chasm here. America does not have the same testing traditions you find in just about every other country in the world. Americans believe in never quitting more than they believe in winning. That's why footbalk teams that lose hard fought games get celebrated almost as though they won.[/quote] The difference is every other country in the world has clear rule and transparency. [/quote] Another difference is that America rewards persistence. Many other countries give you just one chance to measure up in life. Not so in the USA. [/quote] Test measures persistence. It's for 12 years of persistent education Also they do reward persistence with sort of GPA together with Test I don't care if you do GPA only Test only GPA + Test, GPA + Test + whatever. The important thing is clear rule and transparency. [/quote] the only thing you are asking for is how much was spent on making sure those scores were achieved. that's it. and not an amount, a percentage of income. if a 400k family spends 40k and an 80k family spends 8k its the same type of leg up, it is. I am so tired of test prep being a replacement for intelligence and capability. [/quote] Same for GPA, ECs, Essay, etc. I think test score is at least most objective and fair, so that disadvantaged intelligent and capable students get chance to compete. [/quote] Standardized testing has racist origins in the U S (and was used to justify segregation in the military and schools)., is culturally biased ( "pre test" questions that were answered correctly by most blacks were thrown out), and today is more a reflection of household income , test prep, and superscoriing. Not even close to objective. Most of the 1,900 colleges that are now test optional will remain after the AA ruling. Good.[/quote] +1 Those arguing against this are just upset their kid has "lost their advantage" of privilege. Also, they apparently do not understand the numbers---there are simply many more kids with 1400/1450+ SAT and "qualified for elite schools" than there are spots. So most will be rejected. Nobody is entitled to a spot at an elite school, nobody. Once you recognize that and plan with great "target schools" you will be happier. Focus on the goal---getting your degree and starting a career, which can be done at a school ranked #30[/quote] +1 There are good schools even from #31 through #200 or so. People are obsessed with T25s. Expectations for college admissions need to get reset.[/quote] OK, then tell that to the URM who apply to T25. Tell them they should aim lower T100 to T200. It fits them better.[/quote] +100 they'll be much better off where they fit better[/quote] yep, less likely for people to assume that they didn't get in on their own merits.[/quote] Only racists like you assume that. [/quote] no, it's just a natural reaction to affirmative action. Now that we see the stats of URM in these elite colleges, looks like it's largely true.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics