Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "NYTs: if affirmative action goes, say buy-bye to legacy, EA/ED, and most athletic preferences"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]They can’t get rid of athletic preferences or they won’t be able to field a team. It makes no sense.[/b] I still don’t see how colleges won’t be able to still keep doing it with.holistic admissions . The whole process is such a random crapshoot anyway, [/quote] Maybe sports really shouldn't be that important to colleges. Much better things to spend the money on. [/quote] It's customer-driven, and you don't get to decide where I should spend my money.[/quote] what customer? if they want to be business, they should pay taxes like businesses and don't get any State/Federal supports[/quote] This is a great idea. Make colleges pay taxes on their property and their endowments.[/quote] No. They are non profits. Sorry that is the way it works. And you would not pay on an endowment in any event -- just on the taxable gains. But the bigger picture ---- a college with just the best test takers (and most will go back to requiring tests) is not a place most would wantr to be at. Not enough diveristy of experience and thought. [/quote] Is "test-takers" some sort of weird racial euphemism for Asians? Can blacks and Hispanics not be test takers?[/quote] You missed part of the sentence. The poster said “diversity of experience and thought.” They were not referring to race, but go ahead with your race baiting.[/quote] Can two Asians have diversity of experience and thought? Can two test-takers have diversity of experience and thought? Why does the act of test-taking remove all the diversity of experience and thought from the test-takers? Does taking tests turn students into robots? Do test takers spend 24/7 taking tests and never walk outside, don't have hopes and dreams, don't have opinions, don't have culture, family, values?[/quote] Still not getting it. The point is that holistic admissions leave room for other accomplishments, geographic diversity, cultural diversity, etc. Test score alone don’t ensure diversity of thought, interests, etc[/quote] Why should you be judged based on irrelevant factors that you have no control over, like geographic area, culture and race? Should colleges take into account physical attractiveness as well?[/quote] They should. Time for AA for baldies, shorties and fatties. It's only fair.[/quote] Well they already are working towards making fatness a URM. Fat women, at least. You have to give it to liberal women for their ability to shame and guilt everyone into making undesirable traits attractive. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics