Reply to Pelosi’s husband assaulted during breakin

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pelosi’s husband assaulted during breakin "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]According to the DA, the intruder approached Mr. Pelosi in his bedroom while he was sleeping. How horrifying! [/quote]

I'm wondering if the intruder disconnected the alarm system? Otherwise, ours would be incredibly loud once a door was opened or a glass was broken.[/quote]

Nothing makes much sense. That's why I'd like to see the video released. Unless they have no cameras running?

The man thought he was Jesus, according to his ex.[/quote]

You are not entitled to see video of the assault. Believe whatever you want to believe. You will anyway. [/quote]

I don't believe one way or the other. What I'm seeing is a story where the details keep shifting. The audio recording conflicts with the statement. Then they retracted their statement that someone opened the door that clearly wasn't the Pelosi or his attacker, because both had their hands on the same hammer. Pelosi was able to take a bathroom break and use his phone in the bathroom. He could have simply told the police there was an intruder in the house, but he said it was a friend, David. He must have sounded confused because they did a wellness check. At his age, he very well could have been confused, and that's just fine. The important thing is the police got to the scene on time.  People are asking to see footage because of all the changes to the details of what happened.

Either way, his neighbors and his Ex-Wife have made it perfectly clear that the man was decidedly mentally unwell. People here want to state that he is mentally well but being MAGA makes him mentally unwell. That''s, well, insane  :mrgreen:  He's mentally unwell because he thinks he's Jesus and talks to angels, etc.  The media seems to want to ignore that fact. Inconvenient? I don't know. [/quote]

Again, what entitles you have access to the video? The police have it. The guys lawyer will have it. The prosecutor will have it. This isn’t a TV show scripted for your entertainment. It looks like the guy broke in, went looking for Nancy. Paul P woke up. The guy didn’t attack right away. He asked where’s Nancy? PP talked to him, was able to call police, tried to keep him calm until the cops got there. The cops coming in may have triggered the guy to go for the hammer and he hit Paul with it. We don’t need to know every detail. We know there was a break-in and an assault and who was the intruder/assailant and who was the victim. [/quote]

I didn’t say I was entitled. I said it would help clear up what happened. What you state happened is what you are being told happened, but again, that story has changed three times so far at the very least. Imagine this was George Floyd and you just had to take the police version of what happened, that there was no video of any kind. Imagine if we were told as a nation that we were not entitled to see that, that you don’t need to know every detail. [/quote]

It’s extremely clear what happened. Only MAGA are questioning what happened! You are all so looped into conspiracy theories that you are incapable of seeing reality. [/quote]

If its so obvious, there is no reason to hide the bodycam/security cam/dashcam footage.

We can also explain how he got to the house. [/quote]
You think footage is being hidden, but the police don’t just routinely release footage they think people might find interesting. People file a FOIA request and then the police release it, assuming they don’t think it will jeopardize their investigation. If it will jeopardize their investigation, they don’t have to release it. Additionally, the Pelosi’s may file a request to prevent its release if they feel it would cause them harm. Sometimes the courts must rule on these issues. The public doesn’t get to demand immediate access.

Here are some exceptions to the FOIA that might apply to this case:

Exemption 6: Information that, if disclosed, would invade another individual’s personal privacy.

Exemption 7: Information compiled for law enforcement purposes that:
7(A). Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings
7(B). Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication
7(C). Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy
7(D). Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source
7(E). Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law
7(F). Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual[/quote]

Facts and logic and basic common sense mean nothing to MAGA conspiracy theorists. They will devoutly believe what they want to regardless of anything to the contrary, simply because they are absolutely convinced and biased to believe the conspiracy no matter what. It's hopeless to argue with them, it's like arguing with someone in a cult or a schizophrenic who adamantly believes their hallucination.[/quote]
Given the fact that Republicans clearly have no plans to return to sanity or to address the violence they’ve created, where does that leave us normal people? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics