Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Study: "Discussions of D.C. public school options in an online forum" (yes, this one)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Except for the most part they actually DO have much in common with the strangers that you refer to, right? I mean, as you said, this site is heavily a single demographic. It's largely the same demographic helping each other out. It's also a demographic that needs less help than most others . . . [/quote] Well, that's the thing. The person getting the help might be a Harvard-educated Brookings fellow who obviously is quite superior to our run-of-the-mill posters or it might be a low-life website owner. Either case, they get the same help because nobody knows which they are. Beautiful isn't it? Instead of producing reports tarnishing DCUM's reputation, those who want to assist the underserved should be helping them logon on here to get advice. [/quote] Jeff, you should take a break. You are sounding more bitter and less sympathetic as this goes on. I am sure it's not intentional. Just take a breather. [/quote] The study also didn't take into account that imo 25%-ish of the POSTS (of undetermined source -- more than just a FEW trolls? Who knows?) are non-white, race-baiting trolls. And another 25%-ish of the actual users are POC honestly trying to learn from, and contribute to, the forum. And I'd guess the rest of the participants are of the relatively wealthy, white-person variety. Overall, the site is useful, notwithstanding the race-baiting trolls, but his observation is 100% ignored by the Brookings thought leaders. Someone truly interested in advancing the forum would not be going after Jeff for defending his creation from an obviously biased and shoddy piece of work.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics