Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What in DA, ECNL, MLS history would cause you to think they will merge? They will try to destroy each other as they have always done. Too much money involved.[/quote] A well-designed investment absolutely could disrupt ECNL’s dominance. ECNL's annual revenue is between [b]$7-10 million[/b]. Thats not "too much money involved" when youth soccer is a [b]5 billion[/b] annual spend in the US. ECNL isn’t dominant because it’s expensive or sophisticated. It’s dominant because it solved a coordination problem first (One event, hundreds of vetted players, low search cost). A challenger needs to redirect maybe 2–5% of the 5 billion with different alignment. That’s $100–250M annually, an extinction-level event for the current hierarchy. A large investor, federation-level, private equity, or a coalition of MLS + broadcasters + tech, could absolutely rewire the system and make elite participation meaningfully cheaper or free at scale. So yes, the landscape could change. Dramatically. But it wouldn’t look like a flashy new league. It would look like a quiet migration of trust, followed by parents doing the math and choosing relief over fear. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics