Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Laid off and over 50. Ouch. Ageism is tough "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I work for a F500. It can seem like there is ageism but it's more complicated than that. The PP above who showed the pyramid structure nailed it well. There's fewer roles the higher you go but people treat careers as perpetual advancement. Therein lies the conflict. And as someone who's 46 going on 47, it's undeniable that peak energy seems to be 30 to 45. Maybe 50. That's the energy to work long hours, be super proactive, to grind out work, to eagery network. After 50 most people want to slow down and ride it out till retirement. There are exceptions, yes. Tenure = increasing costs. The longer you stay in a role the more expensive you become for that role. Most of the time it's fine, you can be valued for institutional knowledge. But if you are average for your role and there's a RIF, which always happens at some point, you're at risk over a cheaper person. Many people in their 50s get reorged out this way. For people wanting to survive, don't stop learning, don't slow down, don't stay in a role for too long. Even in the same company. It's worth it to move roles every 4-5 years so you avoid starting to appear as a dead end deadweight. Or find that team with a bunch of 20-30 year careerists and get on it, as that's a sign it's under someone who proactively keeps long term employees. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics