Reply to 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "2028 Girls Lacrosse"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What has happened to Hero’s and M&D? Does anyone know why their number of commits have dropped off of late?[/quote]

For starters, the recruit list was clearly NOT made by DG', as it's missing plenty of commits. For example, for M&D 2025 they left off a Maryland commit, a second USC commit, a Villanova commit and possibly others but I don't have time to sit here and double check. The point that Capital is good for recruiting has been made, but I would not take this list as proof of anything beyond that. [/quote]Actually does seem like you have the time to sit there and double check. Until then, we'll go ahead with what the list points to.  [/quote]

Actually I don't have time which is why I didn't double check Hero's and M&D for each year presented. I have no doubt the original poster made sure to get the Cap commitments right, so I wouldn't need to bother there. Anyway, you do whatever you want with the cherry picked data presented to you. [/quote]

I’ll use a term that will resonate with you: “Louder for those in the back” … Once again, all info was sourced from Inside Lacrosse. I’m not under contract with DCUM (or you) to cross reference data sets. Everyone cites IL college rankings as gospel, they are obviously a trustworthy source. If clubs don’t update that source, that’s on them. Haven’t heard one Hero’s parent challenge a thing (and they are quite vocal here), which tells me their commit data is correct.  Maybe M&D should be better at updating these sites. Maybe you could help them instead of coming on here and complaining. Even with the one additional T20 commit you mention, the stats aren’t materially different and the trends stated remain factually accurate. Missing one commit hardly constitutes “cherry picking.” [/quote]

Someone wanted to know why Hero's and M&D has fallen off based on the data presented and a quick glance at the actual commits for one of the teams represented by the data showed that it wasn't accurate enough to be drawing such conclusions. Ultimately, I really don't care one way or the other who updates their commit list and what data you use. As I said initially, it's clear the actual point of this discussion is to make Capital Blue parents feel good about how well positioned they are for the future, and that point has been sufficiently made by the information presented. Congratulations on your DD's future success. [/quote]

Your thesis is right but the statement premise is incorrect. Only one T20 commit was found to be missing for M&D. No one has challenged the integrity of the data presented for Capital or for Hero’s. Trends stated remain accurate and defendable. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics