Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I'm honestly not sure if Lively can file under 46.1 in state court. I don't understand the underlying mechanisms well enough. But I do think Liman's footnote can be interpreted as suggesting an avenue for recovery. This matters to me because I do want there to be avenues for victims to obtain actual damages under 46.1. Whether that avenue is still open to Lively, he clearly has chosen not to say. That's appropriate. But it sounds like from their statements to the press, her lawyers intend to try and find an avenue. So we'll see. I kind of hope they do because I'm curious to see how they will attempt it. But I am not optimistic it will be successful, just curious from a legal nerd POV.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics