Reply to Murch moving to lafayette

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Murch moving to lafayette "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If enough Janney and Murch had thought it through during the recent boundary revisions and accepted reassignment to Hearst, we would not be having this conversation.  By now, they'd be happily settled in at a brand new 90%+ IB school.  Janney classes would not be comically overcrowded and the Murch reno could have been smaller and not have required massive swing space.  Murch probably could have stayed on site during construction. But these families didn't think it through. And now everyone is going to have to pay in time, money and aggravation.  Karma is a strange thing.  The Hearst renovation looks amazing BTW...[/quote]

I don't know why I feel compelled to reply to these comments, but I do. Sigh.

[b]The boundary revision proposals--neither the original one that sent more kids to Hearst, nor the final one that sent more kids to Lafayette--DID NOT reduce Murch's headcount.[/b]

There was no proposal to reduce Murch's headcount on the table. I don't know why people get such joy out of perpetuating this lie. Please be a human being, not a troll. [/quote]

Not going to take the time to dig this up, but one of the earlier maps would have moved Murch's southern boundary much further north.  But somehow that did not make it into the final product.  Wonder why?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics