Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "PARCC monitoring student's social media, wants schools to "punish" them"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Here is the operable term for "measure" according to Merriam Webster--at least, this is what goes with the criterion for "measurable": "4 : something set up and established by authority as a rule for the measure of quantity, weight, extent, value, or quality " The standard as it stands is not measurable. My point is that it is poor quality for a standard. Sure, if they were going to write it as a standard it should have said something like: "Child should correctly write in manuscript at least 10 uppercase letters." Or something like that. At least it would be a standard. However, that does not mean I think it is appropriate. The issue is that the people writing them did not even meet their own criterion. That leaves everything suspect. These standards are not even professionally written. That does not even address the educational content of them. Fail.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics