Reply to Bafta awards controversy

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Bafta awards controversy "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So you're telling me that due to coprolalia, he has absolutely no control over his outbursts... yet his brain is "automatically" able to tailor a specific insult for a specific recipient?

Black people:  Ns
Queen:  f the queen

What's next?
SA survivors:  "you f'ing deserved it"
Women PhDs:  "dumb w---res"
Person in wheelchair:  "cripple"

Really?

I'd maybe buy it if he called everyone Ns or hoes.  But this just seems too far fetched.

Why does his brain go there, lol[/quote]

Watch the movie.[/quote]

The movie is all about how hard this is for HIM.  Even the scene where he gets punched in the bar.  Well... he threw a drink on a stranger.  [b]How do you think that felt for the poor guy who just wanted to have a good time and a random guy douses you with beer for no reason?  [/b]

The movie wants to convince us that "good, loving" people should embrace his outbursts.  Like when he says stuff like "I put c-m in your drink" and they're all "awww!  That's adorable!"  It's not.  I have children and I can't imagine asking my 8 year old daughter to put up with someone yelling "suck my d--k!" to her.  That's not civilized.  That's disgusting.[/quote]

Are you for real? Getting doused with beer once in your life is a walk in the park compared to living with this disability. I mean, I can't even with you. [/quote]

Having a drink thrown on you - completely unprovoked - is assault or battery in most jurisdictions. Are you saying that assault should be excused because the perpetrator a disability?

lol nope[/quote]

"lol" yep, actually[/quote]

Honey, there is something wrong with you.

I am curious how far you’d take this. Let’s imagine pedophilia gets classified as a disability. Because, actually, it is a compulsion for many, not unlike coprolalia. Like Tourette’s, there’s something neurologically wrong with these folks. So now a pedophile assaults your child. Do you still maintain the pedophile should not face repercussions because dIsAbILiTy?  Child just needs more eMpAThY for the poor, misunderstood pedo?[/quote]

You're such a moron I can't believe I'm even bothering to respond to you but here goes.

Someone with a disability that causes physical tics who spills a beer on someone isn't getting charged with battery. I don't know what else to tell you. As to your inane tangent, I'm not responding to that. [/quote] that’s false because there could be a negligence based crime. Ie someone with a tick picks up a gun and the tick happens and the gun fires. They’ll be prosecuted [/quote]

I'll say this slowly so that hopefully you can understand.

What will the person in your stupid hypothetical be charged with? Not murder, I'm guessing. Because that requires intent. As generally does battery.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics