Reply to Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Seems a proposal to shift back to the original option B may go further. That option was prepared and presented in detail and got positive feedback from the community. [/quote]

Agree.

Luxmanor realtor is for it. She can say we need to send WW back to Wheaton because they increase FARMS too much at Woodward for her liking. But it fixes her utilization issue by making it underutilized even more than 9% to 27%. Clearly they have room for WW but don’t want them.[/quote]

She outlines a number of points related to utilization. Which do you think are false/misstated?[/quote]

Look at the number of foreclosed developments. Look at the declining birth rates. Increase in dwelling unites does not equal increases in schooo age children, and def not public school. MoCo has high outmigration of the wealthiest folks and all schools will have high FaRMS by 20232. And ES boundaries are moot as they are about to change. I also predict several MS will close. Look how many are predicted to be at 50 and 60 something percent capacity[/quote]

I doubt the affected families want to bank on that. They’d rather see a more comparable utilization with WJ and balance the risk of overcrowding. I don’t see how your opinion is any more valid than theirs.[/quote]

Who are you considering an affected family? I’m a VM parent and I support Taylor’s recommendation. [/quote]

Referring to families worried about Woodward utilization.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics