Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Jury refuses to indict Sandwich Man and other Trump cop misadventures"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is a federal statute that fits this situation. The law is 18 U.S.C. § 111, which makes it a crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with a federal officer who is carrying out official duties. The statute does not require the object to be dangerous. For a basic misdemeanor charge under section 111(a), the requirement is intentional conduct that creates forcible assault or interference. Courts have found that throwing ordinary items such as food or drinks can count as assault when the act is deliberate and directed at a federal officer. The nature of the object matters only when determining whether the conduct rises to a felony under section 111(b). That part of the statute applies when a dangerous weapon is used or when bodily injury occurs. A soft sandwich does not meet that standard. In practical terms: Intentional contact with the sandwich can lead to a misdemeanor assault charge under 18 U.S.C. § 111(a). A soft item is not a dangerous weapon, so the felony portion of the statute does not apply unless something else escalates the situation. The deciding factor is the intent to throw it at a federal officer performing official duties, not the hardness of the sandwich. Even something that seems harmless can still fit the legal definition of assault if it is thrown on purpose at a federal officer.[/quote] It could but this didn't. Maybe they should have focused on the throwers intent instead of lying about mustard splatters.[/quote] The fact the jury is this bias shows that criminals are not getting fair treatment they are getting off scott free. This hurts DC more, in fact jury should convict regardless if its trump or biden in charge. This makes it look like there is a systemic problem in DC that trump needs to fix.[/quote] The only “problem” in DC is MAGA trash in the White House and patrolling the streets. The jury rightfully decided it wasn’t assault. No reasonable person would conclude it was assault. Period. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics