Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Disappointment"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I smell a 🧌 [/quote] Do you think her profile is too "basic"? She says she regrets not picking more creative ECs, although I think her ECs were perfectly suited for her major + demonstrated her passion.[/quote] Yeah, I agree there is nothing that stands out in her ECs. ECs: not impressive: - A few regional awards (STEM) Actually good: - 200+ volunteer hours @ local hospital everyone has one: - Founder of non-profit this year AOs don't like research for some reason: - Research w/ prof at T30 everyone has one: - Competitive summer program for BME everyone has this: - Lots of community service This year I heard Stanford retracted an acceptance because the applicant lied about volunteer hours. Are those 200 volunteer hours @ local hospital registered with the school?[/quote] Yes, she made sure that everything was registered. I'm assuming the more "basic" ECs were the factor harming her application?[/quote] No, it's just a bizarre system that makes kids do these things. In other countries kids don't have to do these admissions acrobatics.[/quote] No, other countries instead track kids around age 11/12 (or earlier). You are tracked at this age, based on a one day test. Do well, you can be on tract for pre-med/stem/engineering. Do okay, and you can focus on humanities and social sciences (non stem), do worse, and you won't be tracked for much college at all. And without $$$$$$ it is damn near impossible to get off those tracks. So yeah, I 1000% prefer what we have, where a kid can grow academically after 5th/6th grade and still decide to be an engineer or a doctor after age 12. [/quote] Nah. You can pretty much tell where a kid should be by the end of 6th grade. Pretending that kids can “grow” after that is a waste of everyone’s time and of public resources.[/quote] You are a fool, that is obvious. Your comment is pretty stupid in so many ways and highlights your status as a mental midget. I wish that this thread happened earlier this week, your comment would have made for a good laugh. On Wednesday I was chatting with Adam Steltzner Chief Engineer of the last Mars Rover Mission (Perseverance). He's from the bay area and was in town for a conference. Adam dropped out of HS to play in a rock band. He then ended up at a community college before going on to study at CalTech, get his Phd and spend his entire career at the JPL. If you told him that potential was fixed at around 6th grade he would give you a curious look and then use his life story to make you a fool. He is wickedly smart, wickedly funny and a great person but he does not suffer fools gladly and you are a fool. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics