Reply to Boys 2028 mess - considerations and solutions.

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "Boys 2028 mess - considerations and solutions. "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think it’s semantics. The lower level club out b teams is the same as old school rec. maybe the structure has changed but it s very similar. [/quote]

It’s the same or worse talent wise, that’s it.  However it cost 10x as much as rec and it’s not normally neighborhood based.  Rec is where one plays low stress lacrosse with your buddies.  It’s one part hanging out with your boys  and one part lacrosse.  It’s made up of kids of all skill levels, b-aaa.  The top kids would typically also play on a club team.  Rec league was Saturday and HOCO was Sunday so you could play both.  Maybe the days were switched, I can’t remember.  [/quote]

This is exactly it.  Low cost and neighborhood based used to produce better results.  The model where rec comes first and club is for all stars to showcase closer to college recruiting is a much better model that used to produce better results for the DMV.  Paying 10x as much may benefit the clubs.  These fools are trying to make this a full time job so of course they require year round work.  None/zero/nada of these club directors grew up playing only club year round they all played rec themselves.  They may not want you to know that.  Support your local rec teams.  Rec is NOT about level of play. [/quote]It's actually 20x now.  Before add ons.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics