Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Loudoun High School Lacrosse"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was standing by the fence. 43 for Indy had a terrible cheap shot under 10 seconds. Cross check to the head when the player wasn’t looking and didn’t have the ball. Then he was laughing about it in the box when they were sorting out either an ejection or 2 min non releasable. The laughing and cuss word I heard then angered the Riverside coach. Which then prompted a meeting with both coaches and Indy and Riverside ADs. Not sure what was said. I saw the hit on NFHS stream and if that’s not an ejectable hit then I am not sure what is. Completely uncalled for and unsafe. Kind of ruined the end of the game and just left a sour taste throughout the stadium. Unfortunate situation. [/quote] I just watched it. It is pretty bad. Not surprising though. Team has no discipline.[/quote] Kid didn’t even have the ball. It was behind the play and to the head. That’s why I think it should have been ejectable it had nothing to do with the game. Does anyone know if that kid is ok? He tried to get up and then fell back down. [/quote] Went and watched this from the NFHS feed and you are overstating it a bit. [u]Now I did not see it in person[/u], BUT what I see is white (#1 or #7?) has the ball and just passed to another player to his left. #43 in Red comes from about 4 yards and hits him. It looks like he leads with the shoulder and hits the white shoulder high and his stick contacts the white players head. No audio of players so I cant comment on that. Late hit/unsportsmanlike/ illegal body check- Yes Blindside/defenseless player- No, player just made a pass and was hit from the front Targeting- maybe but didn't seemed to be called so I defer to the crew that was there, judgement call inside of 5 yards. Unintentional Cross to Head- Yes, 1 min non releasable. Now mandatory in this situation Intentional Cross to Head (2minNR)- No, I see shoulder contact and stick slide up. Curse word and or mouthing off- No audio so can't comment, but I did not see the crew throw another flag after the fact. If they [b]hear[/b] it that would have been the case. Final call in my book- Mandatory 1 min NR for body/cross contact to head neck. Possible 1 min for late hit, judgement call. Typically not going to stack these unless the teams were already warned and crew was trying to make a point. I have seen much worse, this was not that late/defenseless and off ball as first presented above and how I read it. I don't see the need for an ejection or suspension. However, definitely illegal and should not be part of the game. [/quote] It had nothing to do with the play. There is also context... 8 seconds to go in the game. He wasn't playing defense to stop a player from scoring... the ball is actually in another players stick when he hits the Riverside player. I also, don't see how you say it was only 4 yards, he has a running start and is fully committed to the hit regardless of the Riverside player having the ball or not.... Oh also, 8 seconds and counting left in the game... dont even say "he is playing until the final whisle" we all know that is BS. [/quote] Ma'am, I watched the play. I gave you the interpretation and I have no emotional tie to the game, context or outcome. You obviously do. BUT if you must: [i]8 seconds to go in the game[/i]- Irrelevant [i]He wasn't playing defense to stop a player from scoring[/i]- Defense is always played regardless if it is a scoring act. [i]the ball is actually in another players stick when he hits the Riverside player[/i]- as I agreed late, but not that late. [i]don't see how you say it was only 4 yards[/i]- i have eyes/tape and saw the start of the run at this point [u]fully committed to the hit regardless of the Riverside player having the ball or not[/u]- just not true, started at about 4 yards to commit to the hit, but yes running down field before that [/quote]the rule is whether you are within 5 yards of the ball, not running for x # of yards away. and the ball also has to be loose (ground or air), if you're hitting someone who doesn't have it.[/quote] PP dude broke it down before and did so fairly well. I watched too and it was about a second in time on the clock and he was not lined up or they would have called targeting. Let it go already. _____________moving on_______________[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics