Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "More MOCO Upzoning - Starting in Silver Spring"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Coming soon on to 4 Corners once the county is supporting density without parking. https://sfstandard.com/2024/05/14/san-francisco-parking-cone-wars-neighborhood-disputes/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark[/quote] If the corridor plan transforms Four Corners into San Francisco's Excelsior District, that will actually be a success for Montgomery County.[/quote] DP. If we want Excelsior, Glenmont to Wheaton is the better comparison and better community opportunity. Or Wheaton to Kensington, though shorter, and certain to generate even greater opposition. [b]Four Corners to Wheaton is all about developers' low-hanging fruit from a profit perspective.[/b][/quote] Yup, it avoids the difficult and the ethnic areas so they can build the same cookie cutter project that appeals to the same cookie cutter demographic.[/quote] Please tell us where "the difficult and the ethnic areas" are.[/quote] White Oak and Central Wheaton. They would rather build up a new area rather than redevelop an old one that doesn't have the demographics they want for their over priced bougie apartments.[/quote] They want live bougie without having to earn the money to buy a single family home…if gentrification is the cost, that’s what it takes to be able to ride their bike to the local coffee shop. Current residents of neighborhoods be damned.[/quote] So they're poor, and they're gentrifiers, and somehow this is damning people who live in neighborhoods, because bikes. Also, coffee shops.[/quote] DP One of the main problems is that they aren't gentrifiers. They love gentrification but they don't want to put the effort or risk into gentrifying. [/quote] So they're non-gentrifiers who are causing gentrification? With their bikes?[/quote] Thanks for confirming that bike lanes don’t generate revenue for retail businesses. [/quote] Oh, it's you. Your posts are boring, and there is no point in engaging with them.[/quote] You cannot seem to make up your mind. Not worth engaging, except you cannot stop replying. Just like the story that bikes are good for business, except for when they aren’t. Which is conveniently when you want to tell a different story. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics