Reply to Asian American student with 1590 SAT score blames affirmative action for rejections from 6 colleges

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Asian American student with 1590 SAT score blames affirmative action for rejections from 6 colleges"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Test scores alone are not highly indicative of a successful future college student.  It makes no sense to force a college to admit students based on this criteria.  I don’t know why we put so much weight upon them.  All they really do is generically show relative strengths and weaknesses among high schools.

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/02/19/study-finds-little-difference-academic-success-students-who-do-and-dont-submit-sat#:~:text=The%20study%20confirms%20that%20high,who%20will%20succeed%20in%20college.%22[/quote]

I keep seeing this claim made but there are decades of research studies on this topic and many show that SAT scores are a very strong predictor of not only college grades but future career success as well. [/quote]
+1 which is why MIT went back to requiring SAT scores.[/quote]

MIT is only ONE T25 school.  Georgetown still requires the SAT since it's not in the common app.

How about HYPS and the other 1,800+ who are test optional? How about the SAT/ACT going digital to even stay relevant?

I think you've missed the test optional trend. Get used to it.  It is here to stay.[/quote]
It is here to stay because more and more schools want to increase DEI.  Getting rid of SAT scores is one way to do that.  Why not just get rid of GPAs since there is so much grade inflation and grading is als
o pretty subjective? [/quote]

GPA - and rigor- over 4 years is a better indicator of college success (at least freshman year) than one 3-hour test.

The AOs know this.[/quote]

The AOs are failures in life. If they weren't, they wouldn't be stuck in an admissions office. They have low level degrees in xyz studies type areas and have their own personal social agendas to fulfill. I know this because I have the misfortune of interacting with many of them. Professors are not happy about the trajectory of admissions decisions over the past decade [/quote]
The distain for people who work in education across this forum is so sad. If these failures are picking the classes, why would you want to be part of them? They suck at life, but somehow are able to put together talented cohorts year after year?

[/quote]

Just sour grapes from the PP.

[/quote]

Not to mention, how much "transparency" does China have?? GTFOH.[/quote]

It's really a huge shame that the US has less transparency than even China when it comes to college admission. seriously WTF[/quote]
These are private institutions we are talking about. Not some government-controlled Chinese schools.  :roll: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics