Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What cold case do you reaaallly want solved?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Robert Eric Wone. So, so, so bizarre![/quote] YES! This was the one I was going to post but couldn't remember the guy's name. I read so many articles about it after it happened. Just. So. Weird. [/quote] NP, probably posted on this thread a long time ago about the Wone case. It still disgusts me. A horrific death and an evil abuse of a human being. The DC cops were always sure they knew who the killers were but could not nail them and I sometimes still think about how Wone's murderer(s) are walking around free. [/quote] Is there someone who can link to an article that convinced you that this was a sex game gone awry/the homeowners did it (which seems to be the consensus view here)? I listened to a podcast awhile back that had me convinced that it could have been an intruder and the police were homophobic & gave too much credence to the sex game gone awry. [/quote] Read the Washington post coverage at the time, no way it was an intruder.[/quote] Agree. But I also don't think they were all engaged in some sex game gone awry. I think it was one of them (probably Dylan Ward) and the others covered it up for some reason (blackmail?). I think the police were homophobic and jumped to sex game because they were gay. They also assumed Wone was gay at first, which there was never any evidence of. The evidence about Zaborsky screaming loudly 30 minutes before the police were called strongly suggest that he stumbled on the dead body and seems to vindicate him w/r/t the murder itself. I have a hard time thinking Price would suddenly kill his long time friend for absolutely no reason; not least of all because he was a lawyer and this is about as far from the perfect crime as you could get. But then a lot of the strategies the police used seemed aimed at flipping Ward and he had the most obvious reason ($$) for helping the others cover up, whereas the reverse isn't obvious at all. And would Price really help one of the others cover up the murder of his long time best friend? It's so weird. I do think the whole thing about how they were supposedly about to be charged until Price's brother burgled their house and somehow that derailed the charges VERY weird. Price's brother was a known addict. Why would him burglarizing the place change the police's calculus about charging? Because it was suddenly plausible that there was an intruder? Because the brother was somehow an alternate suspect? Neither of those make a lot of sense given the facts.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics