Reply to Wow Lori Laughlin has NO shame!

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Wow Lori Laughlin has NO shame!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FBI and US Attorneys look like heavy-handed lunatics with the 60 years threat. [b]Nobody, not even eat the rich nutbags, want or think she deserves a year let alone 60 in the slammer. [/b]Just fine them heavily and give her 6 months. This selective enforcement is such a farce. Let me know when Jared Kushner and his dad are sent to prison for this. :roll: [/quote]

Nobody?   I sure do!   And I'm not even an "eat the rich nutbag"--I have no problem with rich people...HONEST rich people.

But yeah.  I think Lori deserves every single minute of a 60 year sentence.  [/quote]

That’s ridiculous.

Everyone should be concerned that social media and the cancel culture apparently dictates who gets crucified by the court.

Her crime is really no different than the others in the college scandal. If Felicity got two weeks, then that’s the ballpark for Lori.

[b]Violent criminals serve far less time than what Lori is facing, and that’s absurd.[/b]

I think perhaps the best punishment here is leaving her with a serious criminal record that effectively results in her not being able to have a passport/access to traveling to foreign countries along with extensive probation that she must pay for. Make her wear an ankle monitor for a year. [/quote]

This. Come on people! 60 years??? Are effing kidding me? Your need for vengeance is getting the better of your judgment here.

She deserves several months. A significant fine/restitution, and a LOOOOONG period of tedious community service that she cannot get out of.[/quote]

60 years is not what the prosecution is actually lobbying for.  60 years is the maximum sentencing if they were considered guilty of all charges and were the masterminds of the racketeering and conspiracy, like Rick Singer facing the same charges.  People like Loughlin and Guiannulli who were just gaming the system are only going to get at the lower end of the scale.  There are no minimum sentences, so they'll likely end up with something under 5 years (most likely under 2 years) based on the parents that have gone before.  However, there was a huge cut to the first round of parents for pleading guilty.  It may be in the under 5 years category for the last group who have plead not guilty and fought the system the entire way.  However, based other parents caught up in the same scandal, they are looking at 6-24 months imprisonment and a fine of $200K+.

Huneeus paid $300K in bribes, sentenced to 5 months, 500 hours community service, $100K fines.
Semprevivo paid $400K in bribes, sentenced to 4 months, 500 hours community service, $100K fines.
Sloane paid $250K in bribes (including fake athletic admissions), sentenced to 4 months, 500  hours community service, $95K fines.
Flaxman paid $250K in bribes, $75K for fake test scores, sentenced to 1 month, 250 hours and $50K fines.

these are the biggest fish so far.  The difference is that each of these people took one of of the plea bargains and plead guilty.  You get lighter sentences when you accept a plea bargain.  For those that don't accept the plea bargain and fight to the end and then are found guilty, you get bigger sentencing penalties.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics