Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I’m sure wayfarer/baldoni are completely relieved with this outcome. I think that’s how you know Lively didn’t “win.” She’ll spin it, like she’s spun everything, but if you actually care to understand the details of this case, you know that a few thousand dollars (plus the earlier $0 settlement) is not a big deal when we could have been talking tens of millions. Baldoni/Wayfarer probably felt like they had to file the defamation suit to get their side of the story heard after the NYT hit piece, and for that they get a (anti)slap on the wrist. Small potatoes for the story they were able to tell. It makes his attorney look pretty astute, playing the long game like that. And on the positive side, 47.1 did what it was supposed to do by providing some protection from retaliatory lawsuits. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
